Old River Lane - Frequently Asked Questions

It is the contract between East Herts (as the landowner) and Cityheart Ltd (as the appointed developer) to progress the Old River Scheme. It sets out the relationship between both parties and covers the details of how Cityheart will be responsible for constructing the buildings, land and public square. Cityheart will acquire a long leasehold of the site (200 years) with the exception of the public square where the freehold will be retained by East Herts Council after Cityheart have built it.

The Development Agreement was signed on the 12 November 2024.
 

• Describes the scheme that Cityheart will deliver, namely a comprehensive redevelopment of land and buildings in the town centre of Bishop’s Stortford by the creation of residential, retail and leisure uses, and public realm
• The agreement also makes it clear that the numbers above are subject to further viability testing, views from the Planning Authority and the Old River Lane Delivery Board. However at the time of signing the agreement both parties feel the above is viable
• Sets out a number of preconditions that need to be met in order for the development to proceed. This includes finalising arrangements in regards to the Waitrose Car Park and finding an alternative location for the UKPN sub-station that is on site
• An important pre-condition relates providing assurance that Cityheart has the necessary funding in place to deliver the scheme (estimated to be around £73m). It also states that Cityheart will undertake an updated viability test to ensure the scheme is still deliverable, and formalises a profit share arrangement should Cityheart’s profits exceed 10% when the scheme is completed 
• Outlines the relationship between the ORL Board and Cityheart, specifically that regular updates on progress will be required and that Cityheart have to seek approval from the Board on the details of the scheme before a planning application is submitted
• Sets out the conditions upon which the agreement can be terminated (for example if Cityheart do not meet their obligations)
• Makes it clear that Cityheart are unable to transfer the agreement to any other organisation without the agreement of the Council
   

Section 43(2) of the Freedom of Act (2000) exempts information whose disclosure would, or would be likely to, prejudice the commercial interests of a public authority or related party. As the Development Agreement covers specific and confidential contractual elements between East Herts and Cityheart it falls under this exemption. We can however share some of the key things it covers as per below.

Although East Herts Council own the land, we do not have the necessary finance or in-house expertise to directly deliver such a large scheme. Therefore, the council decided to run a procurement exercise to find a suitable developer for the site. Following this process, Cityheart were awarded the contract in February 2019. 

Under the terms of the contract, Cityheart will take on leasehold ownership of the site for development, however, possession will not be granted until a planning application is approved.

The approach to the public square is slightly different. The council will retain ownership of this part of the site throughout the construction phase and beyond. However, Cityheart will build the space on the council’s behalf and to our specification. 

The council approved the scheme in December 2017 and work has been underway since then. This includes the demolition of No. 1 The Causeway and the construction of the Northgate End Car Park. However, work on the main site has not yet begun.

Many details had to be worked through including land assembly, the boundary of the development (which has changed since the scheme was launched), existence of power sub-stations and culverts and restrictive covenants. 

Given the length of time between awarding the contract to Cityheart and now, the council sought independent legal advice in early 2023. This was to establish whether it was still possible to go ahead with the contract given the length of time between the award and planned signing of the development agreement along with changes to the scheme. Following advice the Council issued a Voluntary Ex Ante Transparency (VEAT) Notice in September 2024 to alert market operators to the changes and challenge if they so wished. No challenge was received and the Council proceeded to sign the Development Agreement, enabling the scheme to proceed. 

As per the above, an updated Section 123 report, outlining the value of the site being sold to Cityheart against the residual land value, has been produced and agreed. The values of the assets on the site have not changed much since the last report was done given the space is effectively out of use and Charrington’s House is vacant.

The values of the assets can be found in the diagram below. The Council will retain ownership of the public square (approximately 20% of the site). Alongside this the new development will also include roads and amenity space which is likely to be adopted meaning the lease will cover less than 80%. However, assuming Cityheart lease 80% of the site as a starting point that equates to 80% of the total value (ie. 80% of £3.45m, equivalent to £2,760,000). This means that the Council must achieve at least a value (offer from Cityheart) of no less than £2,760,000 if Section 123 requirements are to be met (without entering into a position where a disposal occurs at an undersale value). 

Therefore at a lease price of £2.77m (and it should be noted this is a minimum price) The Council is satisfied that we are achieving good value for money. Moreover, given some of the land will also be amenity space and roads, the actual % of land Cityheart lease is likely to be much less than 80%. It could be as low as 51% assuming just the footprint of the buildings is leased, meaning we would need to achieve a value of at least £1,759,500.

In addition the first version of the Section 123 report from 2019 was based on the assumption that Cityheart would take on the lease of the Old River Lane site (with the exception of the public square space), Water Lane Hall and 1,2,3 Old River Lane. The sale price of £2.77m included all of these assets however under the new scheme The Council retains ownership of these whilst the overall sale receipt stays the same. Therefore the new scheme represents much better value for money than it did previously. 

Since 2017, the council has rightly invested significant time, effort and resources to prepare the Old River Lane site for redevelopment. Over the last six years, this amounts to £4m and includes the costs to buy property and assemble the land to be in council ownership and externally commissioned works such as design and feasibility studies, and legal, property and procurement advice.

See a full breakdown of the money spent up to 31 March 2022 here.

All spending for the year 2023/24 can be found here.

The financial risks of scrapping the current scheme are significant. The costs that have been incurred to date, as mentioned above, have all been capital spending. The distinction between revenue and capital spending is much stronger in terms of the sources of council finance than you might ordinarily expect in the accounts of a business or other organisation.

Revenue is the day-to-day expenditure and includes salaries, wages and running costs. The council funds revenue expenditure through revenue income sources such as council tax. If the council spends money on improving the council’s assets, then this is capital expenditure. This would include purchasing new assets, such as land and buildings, but also refurbishing and improving existing ones. Capital expenditure is funded through capital income sources such as capital receipts and borrowing. 

Councils need to ensure, and also demonstrate, that they are complying with these rules by making sure that there is a clear separation between capital and revenue in all of its financial activities. These rules are set out in the Local Government Act 2003 (section 7-11, 21) and various Local Authorities (Capital Finance and Accounting) (England) (Amendment) Regulations from 2003 onwards.

If we were to stop the scheme, the £4m spent to date would need to be charged to the council’s revenue account. This means we would need to find another £4m of savings this financial year on top of an already challenging budget. The impact of this would be overwhelming on our finances.

Although we have not signed the development agreement with Cityheart, they have been awarded a contract and we have been working with them on the basis that it would be signed at some point. If we were to cease working with Cityheart, they would likely seek to recover some of the costs they have incurred to date, and these would need to be found on top of the £4m.
 

The site was sold to Hendersons in 2010 and then purchased back by the Council in 2015, although it should be noted the site included different assets.
 
In 2010 the Council owned and subsequently sold: 

• The land that Charringtons House is on but not the building itself
• No. 1 The Causeway
• Causeway Car Park
• Waitrose Car Park 

 After this the Council leased back

• The ground floor of Charringtons House
• No. 1 The Causeway
• Causeway Car Park
• Waitrose Car Park 

 In 2015 the decision was taken to purchase the following:

•  Charringtons House (land and building)
• No. 1 The Causeway
• Causeway Car Park
• Waitrose Car Park 
• 1-3 Old River Lane

 
The background to the report and minutes can be found here: Agenda for Executive on Tuesday 28th July, 2015, 7.00 pm - East Herts District Council 

The scheme we are developing is different to the scheme Hendersons had proposed in 2010, which is understandable given they couldn’t make it viable. In addition, the value of the assets on the site have decreased since 2015, notably no. 1 the Causeway which has since been demolished and Charrington’s House which is now vacant.
 
The value of the site is entirely dependent on the market value after it has been developed (called the gross development value). The current land value is therefore not the starting point for understanding how much Cityheart will buy the leasehold for.
 
The developer will need to make a large investment to complete the development (this is called the gross development cost). As is usual for most developments, this figure includes a 10% profit margin for the developer to accommodate the fact they will need to borrow in order to finance the scheme and it needs to be viable for them as a business. These figures will of course change depending on property values and other variables over time. At the time of awarding the contract to Cityheart, the gross development value was estimated to be £72.99m. The gross development cost was estimated to be £70.22m. The difference between these two values (i.e. £2.77m) is known as the residual land value and this is the amount that Cityheart will purchase the leasehold of their part of the development for (which excludes the whole site apart from the footprint of the arts area). 
 
This residual land value figure comes with two additional checks and balances. One is that if the developer makes more than 10% profit then this has to be shared 50/50 with the council. The other is that the existing land value has to be validated through a Section 123 report before the development agreement can be signed. The purpose of this report, to be signed off by the council’s Section 151 officer, is to demonstrate we are achieving the best price reasonably attainable, ie. In other words that public assets are not being given away on the cheap. 
 

The council’s wider vision for Old River Lane, developed over many years through consultation with the community, is to bring about a contemporary, mixed-use development that will serve as a lively town centre hub for leisure and business. For details of key milestones and decisions taken to date, please see our ORL timeline, which also covers the history of the original idea for an arts centre and how it has changed to a public square. 

Charringtons House was always identified for demolition as part of these plans (as was No. 1 the Causeway on the same site). This is the still the case to enable the wider development. However, we intend to keep the southern part of the foundations as the basis for the proposed temporary structure/pavillion on the public square. 

Water Lane Hall was purchased specifically by the council in 2019 for demolition as part of the land assembly and enabling works for the scheme. However, as part of the changes to the original scheme including moving a to a more modest public square in the interim period before the funding for an arts centre can be secured, the boundary of the development has been adjusted. This means Water Lane Hall is no longer part of the enabling works and does not need to be demolished. 

As above, the hall was bought by the council for demolition to enable the re-provision of parking spaces and has thus had no additional investment made into it in recent years. Even if this had not been the case, the hall was already in a relatively poor condition and requires significant capital expenditure for the property to be brought up to an acceptable standard. 

With that in mind the council commissioned a full structural survey of Water Lane Hall. As an older building, we have long been aware of its many challenges. Although it is no longer part of the Old River Lane development, the council is committed to fully understanding the cost implications of maintaining the building once the lease with the United Reformed Church expires later this year.

The council’s priority was to ensure the survey was carried out by a reputable and competent company with a recognised brand and pedigree. In turn it was made clear to the surveyors that their report would be published and in the public domain. AECOM was commissioned to undertake the survey and they reported their findings to the council at the end of April 2025.

The report, which spans over 200 pages, highlights a number of significant issues, including:

• Overall, the principal loadbearing structure of Water Lane Hall appears to be doing well for its age, particularly given that it has been exposed to prolonged water ingress together with partially unheated internal spaces. However, there is clear subsidence which would require underpinning
• The external masonry walls show signs of spalling, cracking, and general deterioration
• The pitched roof coverings need replacing and the flat roof areas are also approaching the end of their lifecycle
• Internally, the building fabric is significantly aged and worn, with significant water damage and cracking in various areas
• In order to meet the anticipated government requirements for EPC ratings on privately leased spaces, significant upgrades to the fabric of the building and MEP (mechanical, electrical and plumbing) systems are required

The estimated cost of addressing all the issues identified is at least £1.6 million. While the council has set aside some funding for essential maintenance of Water Lane Hall, this falls considerably short of the amount required.

Given the council’s current financial constraints, we’re not in a position to commit the significant funding needed to restore Water Lane Hall. However, we fully recognise the building’s historic character and the affection in which it is held by many in our community. We are keen to talk to partners and community groups about any ideas they may have for its future.

The main findings of the report can be found on our website. 

A full version of the report can be obtained by visiting the Council reception in Navigation House, Riverside, Bishop’s Stortford.

The URC Church lease the building and are responsible for the hiring of the hall and management of bookings. Groups that currently use the hall can continue doing so by contacting them directly. 

Water Lane Hall is not a listed building and therefore has no protected historic or archaeological status. It is, however, in a Conservation Area and does have several interesting and unusual features, including memorial stones, roofing timbers and tiles.

Where possible, the council shares information on the scheme. For example this includes minutes of the meetings of the Old River Lane Delivery Board.

However, not all information can be shared and exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (see part II) are used where appropriate. This applies in the case of the development agreement with Cityheart (covered under section 43 – prejudicial to commercial interests) and the legal advice the council received on procurement (covered under Section 42 – legal professional privilege). 

Releasing of information is considered on a case by case basis.

We’ve opened the new Northgate End multi-storey to consolidate parking and free up pivotal space in the heart of the town centre for redevelopment. The planning approval to build this new car park included a condition that Causeway car park must be closed in order to facilitate free flowing traffic through the town centre. It was also the view of Highways that having both car parks open undermines sustainable travel objectives. The planning application and decision notice can be viewed on our planning portal (see 3/18/0432/FUL). 

It is highly unlikely that this condition can be varied without a significant change in circumstances to when planning approval was granted. Unfortunately, a preference to park in Causeway instead of the new multi-story car park doesn’t constitute a change.

This means Causeway and Charringtons can no longer legally be used for parking and are permanently closed ahead of redevelopment. However, the space is currently being used for a regular car boot sale and community events.